USPTO serial 78138420
SOCIAL LITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYES, GINA CLARK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SOCIAL LITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Erica K. Doran
ERICA K DORAN LAW OFFICE OF ERICA DORAN42 CHURCH STSYOSSET, NY 11791UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | PERFUMES, COSMETICS, AND SKIN TREATMENTS, NAMELY, SKIN CLEANSERS, SKIN TONERS, SKIN MOISTURIZERS, SKIN ENHANCEMENT TREATMENTS, NAMELY, CREAMS, GELS, LOTIONS, SCRUBS AND NON-MEDICATED SKIN SERUMS; SKIN CREAMS, SKIN LOTIONS, FACIAL MASKS, SKIN CAMOUFLAGE TREATMENTS, NAMELY, CREAMS, GELS, LOTIONS, SCRUBS AND NON-MEDICATED SKIN SERUMS; NON-MEDICATED ACNE TREATMENTS, NAMELY, CREAMS, GELS, LOTIONS, SCRUBS AND NON-MEDICATED SERUMS; EYE TREATMENTS, NAMELY, EYE CREAMS, EYE GELS, EYE SHADOWS, EYE PENCILS, EYEBROW PENCILS, MASCARAS, CONCEALERS, EYEBROW POWDERS, EYE LASHES, EYE LINER POWDERS, EYE LINER LIQUIDS; LIP TREATMENTS, NAMELY LIPSTICK, NON-MEDICATED LIP BALM, LIP PENCILS, LIP GLOSS; SKIN FOUNDATIONS; FACE POWDERS; BLUSHES; BLEACH CREAMS FOR THE SKIN; BODY BATH PRODUCTS, NAMELY BODY CLEANSERS, HAND CREAMS, BODY MOISTURIZERS, BODY OILS; NAIL CREAMS, GELS AND NON-MEDICATED SERUMS; FOOT CREAMS, GELS, SCRUBS, AND NON-MEDICATED SKIN SERUMS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 20, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 7, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |