Drawing for DUALFLEX

USPTO serial 78139185

DUALFLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS, AMY E
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DUALFLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN K. FITZGERALD, ESQ.

JOHN K FITZGERALD ESQ FULWIDER PATTON LEE & UTECHT, LLP6060 CTR DR 10TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90045UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010SURGICALPRODUCTS, NAMELY, INTRAOCULAR LENSES AND IMPLANTABLE REFRACTIVE LENSESABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 9, 2003ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 9, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 9, 2003OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Mar 18, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 21, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 1, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 21, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance