USPTO serial 78139229
ARTISTIC STUDIOS LIMITED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, REBECCA A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARTISTIC STUDIOS LIMITED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James K. Lewis
VAREN CRAIG BELAIR PATTON BOGGS LLP1660 LINCOLN ST STE 2050DENVER, CO 80264UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Stationery goods, namely, greeting cards, calendars, boxed notes, writing pads, note pads, stencils, posters, children's activity books, paper invitations, photo albums, keepsake boxes, Christmas cards, party favors and wrapping paper. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 24, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |