USPTO serial 78139469
CARDDATA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 14, 2004
- Examiner
- CLAYTON, CHERYL A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CARDDATA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jamie N. Pitts
Jamie N. Pitts The Law Office of Jamie N. Pitts, Esq. P.A.887 WEST MARIETTA STREET, NWSUITE M-105ATLANTA, GA 30318Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PRINTED MATERIALS, NAMELY NEWSLETTERS AND RESEARCH REPORTS IN THE FIELD OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO ALL TYPES OF PAYMENT CARDS, NAMELY CREDIT CARDS, DEBIT CARDS, SMART CARDS, PREPAID CARDS, ATM CARDS, LOYALTY CARDS AND PHONE CARDS FOR THE USE OF CONSUMERS AND PROFESSIONALS IN THE PAYMENT CARD INDUSTRY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 31, 1995 |
| 036 | FINANCIAL RESEARCH, NAMELY, COMPILATION OF DATA, STATISTICS AND RESEARCH OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO ALL TYPES OF PAYMENT CARDS, NAMELY CREDIT CARDS, DEBIT CARDS, SMART CARDS, PREPAID CARDS, ATM CARDS, LOYALTY CARDS AND PHONE CARDS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 31, 1995 |
| 041 | ON-LINE PUBLICATION OF DATA, STATISTICS AND RESEARCH OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO ALL TYPES OF PAYMENT CARDS, NAMELY CREDIT CARDS, DEBIT CARDS, SMART CARDS, PREPAID CARDS, ATM CARDS, LOYALTY CARDS AND PHONE CARDS FOR THE USE OF CONSUMERS AND PROFESSIONALS IN THE PAYMENT CARD INDUSTRY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 31, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RADCLIFFE SHERMAN LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CardWeb.com, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CardWeb.com, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named CARDDATA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 13, 2010 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Feb 6, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 30, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |