USPTO serial 78139522
MC2
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KELLY, JOHN M
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MC2?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Magnetic encoded cards and cards containing and integrated circuit chip, namely, encoded electronic chip cards containing software and other programs used for the purpose of conducting financial transactions; magnetic coded charge cards, magnetic coded bank cards, magnetic coded credit cards, magnetic coded debit cards and payment cards | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2007 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 23, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 1, 2007 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 15, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 6, 2006 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |