Drawing for BEST STAR

USPTO serial 78139765

BEST STAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEST STAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Larry L. Saret

LARRY L SARET MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLC401 N MICHIGAN AVESTE 1900CHICAGO, IL 60611

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Food products, namely sweetened condensed milk, unsweetened condensed milk, soy-based food beverages used as a milk substitute, frozen seafoodACTIVE
030Food products, namely frozen appetizers, namely dumplings and potstickersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 5, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 27, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jan 27, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jan 27, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 18, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Aug 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 27, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 18, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jan 27, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 4, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 15, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 25, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 13, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 14, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance