Drawing for PROTEUS

USPTO serial 78139987

PROTEUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KELLY, JOHN M
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROTEUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gretchen R. Stroud

GRETCHEN R STROUD COOLEY GODWARD LLPFIVE PALO ALTO SQ 4TH FL3000 EL CAMINO REALPALO ALTO, CA 94306-2155

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware; computer peripherals; electronic audio and video components, namely amplifiers, receivers, tuners, sound mixers, stereo loudspeakers, and digital audio and video players and recorders; computer software to generate, reproduce, record, control and improve computer and audio equipment sound quality; computer software for the arrangement, sequencing, storage, reproduction, transmission and editing of sound; computer software used for audio playback and for recordingACTIVEJan 20, 1989

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 31, 2007PCDEPETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED—
Jan 4, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Nov 7, 2006PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2006PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jul 14, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 14, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 11, 2006EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 3, 2006GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 29, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 29, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 28, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 15, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 12, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 12, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 20, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 19, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 29, 2003GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 19, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance