Drawing for PARAGON

USPTO serial 78140161

PARAGON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KOVALSKY, LAURA G
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PARAGON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel G. Dougherty

JONATHAN N OSDER ESQ DONAHUE, GALLAGHER, WOODS & WOOD, LLP591 REDWOOD HWYSTE 1200MILL VALLEY, CA 94941

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer services, namely, developing, customizing, integrating, implementing and providing training, technical support, maintenance and updates for computer software for planning, managing and executing commercial distribution and transportation operations, namely, vehicle selection, vehicle routing using digital mapping, alternative vehicle routing, vehicle coordination and scheduling, vehicle location tracking, vehicle management, fleet performance monitoring and reporting, fleet resource calculation, geocoding, distribution network planning and optimization, and map and road displays.ACTIVEMar 22, 1984

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 30, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 5, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 5, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 12, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance