Drawing for CERF

USPTO serial 78140263

CERF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
THOMAS, AMY E
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CERF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas T. Johnson

DOUGLAS T JOHNSON MILLER & MARTIN LLPSTE 1000 VOLUNTEER BLDG832 GEORGIA AVECHATTANOOGA, TN 37402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009embedded computer hardware for access to a communications network; embedded computer firmware for the storage, retrieval and transmission of dataACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 29, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Mar 23, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 8, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 29, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jun 30, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Jun 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 26, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 27, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance