Drawing for R DIRTY DENIM

USPTO serial 78140418

R DIRTY DENIM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CRAWFORD, MARY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with R DIRTY DENIM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing and accessories, namely coats, jackets, vests, shirts, pants, jeans, dresses, skirts, sweaters, jerseys, t-shirts, tanks, shorts, overalls, sweat suits, jogging suits, underwear, socks, footwear, gloves, hats and bandanasACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 10, 2005UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Oct 27, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 17, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 6, 2005UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED—
Aug 29, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 2, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 17, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 17, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 17, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 21, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 17, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 23, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 16, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 20, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 20, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 5, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance