Drawing for IXTAVIA

USPTO serial 78140695

IXTAVIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2853389Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 15, 2004
Examiner
SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with IXTAVIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven H. Hartman

Maury M. Tepper, III; Jacquelyn Austin, M. Christo Tepper & Eyster, PLLC3724 Benson DriveRaleigh, NC 27609UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Diagnostic preparations for clinical or medical laboratory use; Diagnostic apparatus and instruments for medical use, namely blood assay monitoring kits comprised of chemical reagents used to detect the presence of drug substance in the bloodSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 21, 2011C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Dec 15, 2009CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Dec 14, 2009APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 27, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2004R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 23, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 3, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 21, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 16, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 24, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2003GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 6, 20031.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Jun 6, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance