USPTO serial 78140889
NEW ADVANCED SEARCH AGENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOULTON, KELLY F
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NEW ADVANCED SEARCH AGENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Livingston, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Theodore Oshman
90 WILLIAM STNEW YORK, NY 10038-4703UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING SEARCH ENGINES FOR OBTAINING DATA ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK WHICH ORGANIZES SUCH INFORMATION BY CLUSTERING RESULTS IN SPECIFIC CATEGORIES AND ALLOWS USERS TO ACCESS A WIDE RANGE OF INFORMATION IN MULTIPLE FORMATS; PROVIDING CUSTOMIZED ON-LINE WEB PAGES FEATURING USER DEFINED INFORMATION, WHICH INCLUDES SEARCH ENGINE RESULTS AND ON-LINE WEB LINKS TO OTHER WEB SITES; PROVIDING A WEBSITE FEATURING SEARCHING AND BROWSING FUNCTIONS TO ENABLE USERS TO EXPLORE A WIDE VARIETY OF TOPICS ON A MULTI-USER GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK. | ACTIVE | Jun 3, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |