USPTO serial 78140942
PASHA'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PASHA'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank Rodriguez
FRANK RODRIGUEZ CORPORATE CREATIONS PASTE 221E11380 PROSPERITY FARMS RDPALM BEACH GARDENS, FL 33410Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Acidophilus milk Almonds (Processed) Apricots (Processed) Artichokes (Processed) Beverages (Dairy-based food) Cakes and pies (Fruit-based fillings for) Cheese (in general) Cheese food Cheese spreads Cheese substitutes Chocolate food beverages (Dairy-based) Cream Cheese Dairy products (in general) Dairy-based dips Dairy-based food beverages Dates (Processed) Dips (Dairy-based) Dips (in general) Dips (Snack Food) Dressing (Salad) Edible Oil Entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables (frozen, prepared, and/or packaged) Fillings for cakes and pies (Fruit-based) Fish (general) Food beverages (Dairy based) Food beverages (Vegetable-based) Fruit preserves Fruit-based snack food Fruits (Dried) Jams Jellies Kefir Lentils Marmalade Meat Mincemeat Nuts (shelled, roasted or otherwise processed) Oil (Edible) Oil (Salad) Olives (Processed) Oranges (Processed) Paste (Fruit) Paste (Vegetable) Pickled vegetables Pickles Quince (Processed) Raisins Salad oil Salads (Garden) Salads (Vegetable) Sandwich spread Seeds (Processed edible) Snack dips (in general) Snack Food (Fruit based) Snack Food (in general) Snack mix consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts and/or grains Soups Spreads (in general) Spreads (Cheese) Spreads (Vegetable-based) Tahini Vegetable paste Vegetable-based food beverages Vegetables (Pickled) Yogurt (In general) | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Almond Paste Bagels Bakery goods Bakery goods (Mixes for making) Bakery products Barbecue sauce Beverages (Herbal Food) Bread Bread sticks Burritos Cakes Cereal based snack food Chips (Flour-based) Chips (Grain-based) Coffee Cookies Couscous Custards Dough Doughnuts Egg rolls Empanadas Flavoring syrup Fillo dough Food beverages Frozen dough Frozen pastries Frozen yogurt Halvah Herbal food beverages Herbs (processed) Ice cream Marinades Marzipan Meat Pies Molasses Pasta Paste (In general) Paste (Almond) Pastries Pita Bread Pizza Pizza crust Pizza dough Puddings Ravioli Rice Salad dressings Seasonings (In general) Semolina (Processed) Shakes Sorbet Spices Syrup (Flavoring) Tea (in general) Tea-based beverages Tortillas Wafers Yogurt (In general) | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Concentrates (In general including fruit juice) Concentrates, syrups or powders used in the preparation of soft drinks Fruit drinks Juices (beverage) Lemonade Mineral water Nectars (Fruit) Syrups for making beverages Vegetable juice (beverage) Water (drinking) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 18, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 11, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 10, 2004 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |