USPTO serial 78141152
CLUB RED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLUB RED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Luxury food products, namely, cavier; milk | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, refreshing soft drinks, sports drinks, hyper and hypo tonic isotonic drinks for use by athletes, beer, mineral and aerated water, fruit drinks and fruit juices, syrups for making soft drinks, essences and powders for use in making fruit drinks, and non-alcoholic cocktail mixes | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages, namely, vodka | ACTIVE | — |
| 034 | Tobacco products, namely, pipe tobacco, cigarettes and cigars | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment in the nature of live dinner theater productions based on a motion picture about the trials and tribulations in bringing a Russian acrobatics theater troupe to the United States during the Cold War | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Brausen, Michael M.
- Other trademarks owned by Brausen, Michael M.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Other trademarks in Class 034
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named CLUB RED
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 26, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 3, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 14, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |