Drawing for DELICE

USPTO serial 78141172

DELICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WOOD, CAROLINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DELICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

G. Franklin Rothwell, Esq.

G FRANKLIN ROTHWELL ESQ ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK, PC1425 K ST NWSTE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003TOILET SOAP, SKIN SOAP, BUBBLE BATH SOAP, SHAMPOO, BODY LOTIONS AND CREAMS, HAIR CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, HAIR STYLING GEL, HAIR STYLING LOTIONS, HAIR SPRAY, HAIR LOTION FIXANTS, EYE SHADOWS, EYE PENCILS, EYE-LINERS, FACIAL MAKE-UP REMOVER, NAIL POLISH, SUN TANNING PREPARATION, SKIN MOISTURIZERS AND LOTIONS, AND PERFUMEACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 3, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 8, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 30, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 2, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance