USPTO serial 78141585
PUGILIST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PUGILIST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Stuffed toy animals; dolls; action figures; arcade games; card games; computer game programs; gymnastic apparatus; sports equipment, namely, boxing gloves; sport balls; punching bags and balls,boxing ring, speed bags; exercise benches; manually-operated exercise equipment; exercise machines, weight lifting belts; chest protectors for sports; shin guards for athletic use; elbow pads for athletic use; athletic protectors; namely, head protectors, breast protectors, and groin protectors; athletic supporters; mouthpieces for boxing wrestling, baseball and skating; grip tape for wrapping hands; grip tape for boxing and wrestling boots and shoes; grip tape for bats and clubs; inline, roller, speed and grinding skates; basketballs, softballs, baseballs, soccer balls, lacrosse balls and sticks, footballs, rugby balls; hockey pucks; catcher masks for baseball and softball; field, ice and roller hockey sticks; goggles for scuba, swimming and ski boarding; skateboards, toy vehicles, motorized toy vehicles and board games | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 23, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 10, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |