USPTO serial 78142405
CHOREO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHOREO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Becky L. Troutman
BECKY L TROUTMAN THELEN REID & PRIEST LLPP O BOX 190187SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94119UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | (Based on Intent to Use) Electronic messaging services; electronic messaging services, namely, organization and coordination of electronic or computerized message exchanges, namely the orchestration, sequencing, and significance of the message exchanges between different parties within a commercial relationship or an information exchanging relationship | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 27, 2005 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 19, 2005 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 29, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |