USPTO serial 78142956
BABY BRASS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2855414Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 15, 2004
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BABY BRASS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Alpharetta, GA
Alpharetta, GA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lee B. Beitchman
LEE B BEITCHMAN BEITCHMAN & HUDSON215 14TH ST NWATLANTA, GA 30318UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pre-recorded videotapes, videodiscs, digital video discs, audio cassettes and compact discs featuring live and animated action, music, sound effects, and photographic and graphic images intended to develop the intellectual and creative faculties of infants and children | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 28, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 17, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2003 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 24, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |