USPTO serial 78143100
ENPOL IT'S A WRAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, BRIAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENPOL IT'S A WRAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stanley M. Erjavac
STANLEY M ERJAVAC HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, PLCP O BOX 828BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Polymers and plastics, unprocessed plastics in the nature of filtering materials and polymers for use in manufacturing chemical mixing sachets, detergent sachets, cotton wool bud sticks, laundry bags, fishing bait bags, diapers, feminine hygiene products, hospital gloves and gowns, refuse sacks, carrier bags, pallet wrap, disposable gloves, agricultural films, seedling trays, beverage can holders, bottle labels, semiconductor packaging, disposable plates, cups, cutlery, loose fill packaging, molded packaging, heat insulation material, seat cushions, cigarette filters, and fire retardant materials; and adhesives for general bonding and repair purposes. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 4, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 29, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 28, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 13, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 12, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 28, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 5, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 16, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |