USPTO serial 78144526
BUDDHA-BAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 1, 2008
- Examiner
- COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with BUDDHA-BAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PARIS, FR
Paris, FR
Paris, FR
Paris, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Farhad Novian
FARHAD NOVIAN NOVIAN & NOVIAN LLP1801 CENTURY PARK E STE 1201LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | [Jewelry, horological and chronometric instruments, namely, clocks and watches] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 2006 |
| 016 | Printed matter, newspapers, magazines, books, stationery, photographs, pens, pencils | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1999 |
| 021 | [Household and kitchen utensils and containers, crockery not of precious metal, plates not of precious metal, dishes not of precious metal, champagne-buckets, bowls not of precious metal, glasses for drinking] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GEORGE V. EATERTAINMENT
- Other trademarks owned by George V Restauration
- Other trademarks owned by George V Restauration
- Other trademarks owned by George V Restauration
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named BUDDHA-BAR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2023 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 23, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 23, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 26, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 1, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 7, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 2, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 30, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 13, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 11, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 1, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 7, 2004 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 31, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 1, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 19, 2002 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 19, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |