USPTO serial 78144692
BAD GIRL'S GUIDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BAD GIRL'S GUIDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Franicsco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KAREN S FRANK
KAREN S FRANK HOWARD RICE ET ALTHREE EMBARCADERO 7TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely an on-going television program featuring drama and comedy | ACTIVE | Jun 17, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 6, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |