Drawing for PENGUINDOWS

USPTO serial 78144952

PENGUINDOWS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHOSID, ROBIN S
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PENGUINDOWS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert C. Cumbow

ROBERT C CUMBOW GRAHAM & DUNN PC2801 ALASKAN WAY STE 300 PIER 70SEATTLE, WA 98121-1128UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, namely, software that emulates other computer software in order to enable uses to execute application software that was written to run on other operating systems, that may be downloaded from a global computer networkABANDONEDJun 24, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 9, 2004ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 9, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 9, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 9, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 9, 2004OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Feb 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 19, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 2, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 23, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 8, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 8, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 23, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance