Drawing for ENVISION

USPTO serial 78145100

ENVISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AWRICH, ELLEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENVISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark J. Diliberti

MARK J DILIBERTI FOLEY & LARDNERSTE 3800777 E WISCONSIN AVEMILWAUKEE, WI 53202-5306

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Display system for use in a vehicle, namely, cameras, a display screen, and a support console, used to increase the driver's field of visionABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2003ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Aug 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 27, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 9, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 24, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 21, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 13, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance