Drawing for BUMPY GIN

USPTO serial 78145119

BUMPY GIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARTNER, JOHN M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BUMPY GIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brett A. August, Esq.

BRETT A AUGUST PATTISHALL MCAULIFFE NEWBURY HILLIARD311 S WACKER DRSTE 5000CHICAGO, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Distilled alcoholic beverages, namely, liquor and spiritsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 8, 2003ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Oct 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 8, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 22, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance