USPTO serial 78145266
FLEXCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 18, 2004
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with FLEXCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Downers Grove, IL
Downers Grove, IL
Downers Grove, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kourtney A. Mulcahy
Kourtney A. Mulcahy Akerman LLP777 S Flagler DriveSuite 1100 West TowerWest Palm Beach, FL 33401Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | METAL FASTENERS, NAMELY, NUTS, BOLTS, STAPLES FOR INDUSTRIAL USE, RIVETS, HINGE PINS, HINGE PIN RETAINING WASHERS AND CHUCKS; METAL FASTENERS AND COUPLINGS FOR BELTS, CLIPS FOR USE DURING THE APPLICATION OF BELT FASTENERS AND RIP PLATES FOR REPAIRING TEARS IN BELTS | ACTIVE | Mar 25, 1916 |
| 008 | HAND TOOLS AND COMPONENTS THEREOF, NAMELY, WRENCHES, BORING BITS, CLAMPS, PUNCHES, TEMPLETS, BOLT BREAKERS, BELT GRIPPING TOOLS, RIVET DRIVING TOOLS, RIVET FLARING TOOLS, COUNTERSINKING TOOLS, ASSEMBLY TOOLS FOR BELT FASTENERS, BELT SKIVING TOOLS AND BELT CUTTING TOOLS | ACTIVE | May 31, 1923 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Flexible Steel Lacing Company
- Other trademarks owned by Flexible Steel Lacing Company
- Other trademarks owned by Flexible Steel Lacing Company
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named FLEXCO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2024 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2024 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 2, 2024 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 2, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 13, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2020 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 2, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 2, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 2, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 14, 2013 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 10, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 18, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 24, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 4, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |