Drawing for SECURITYCOMMUNICATOR

USPTO serial 78145576

SECURITYCOMMUNICATOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMPSON, LAVERNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SECURITYCOMMUNICATOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009The Cenuco Mobile Security Communicator allows the entire company to be connected and be viewed in real-time It is a monitoring system that keeps track of a company The customer is provided with a communicator, digital video cameras, integrated security software, network hub, and a database-enabled encryption password protectionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 22, 2004PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Mar 29, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 11, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 8, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance