USPTO serial 78146324
SANTA PAULA FANCY FOODS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 21, 2004
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SANTA PAULA FANCY FOODS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
City of Commerce, CA
City of Commerce, CA
City of Commerce, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
AnneMarie Kaiser, Boris Zelkind, Louis J. Knobbe, Don W. Martens, James B. Bear, Darrell L. Olson, William B. Bunker, William H. Nieman, Arthur S. Rose, James F. Lesniak, Ned A. Israelsen, Drew S. Hamilton, John B. Sganga, Jr., Edward A. Schlatter, Gerard
ANNEMARIE KAISER BORIS ZELKIND LOUIS J KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP14TH FL2040 MAIN STIRVINE, CA 92614Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | JARRED VEGETABLES AND FRUITS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 2, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 14, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 29, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 9, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2003 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |