Drawing for BOOSTIT

USPTO serial 78146426

BOOSTIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENZMILLER, ANDREW
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BOOSTIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for Server Based Computing management and access to server farms using the ICA protocolACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 26, 2005ICNANOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 26, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 6, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 2, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 23, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 20, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 16, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 15, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 13, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 26, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 12, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance