USPTO serial 78146530
LOKK · BOLT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 14, 2006
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with LOKK · BOLT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
OAKLEIGH VIC, AU
Brookvale, New South Wales, AU
Frenchs Forest, NSW, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mainak H. Mehta
Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | SECURING DEVICES FOR USE ON GATES AND DOORS, NAMELY RETAINING BOLTS AND LATCHES OF METAL OR PREDOMINATELY OF METAL WITH PARTS NOT OF METAL; AND PRODUCTS HAVING AN INCORPORATED LOCKING STRUCTURE OF METAL, NAMELY, DROP-BOLT AND CANE-BOLT LOCKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | SECURING DEVICES FOR USE ON GATES AND DOORS, NAMELY, RETAINING BOLTS AND LATCHES OF NON-METAL OR PREDOMINANTLY OF NON-METAL WITH PARTS NOT OF METAL; AND PRODUCTS HAVING AN INCORPORATED NON-METAL LOCKING STRUCTURE, NAMELY, DROP-BOLT AND CANE-BOLT LOCKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by D & D TECHNOLOGIES PTY LTD
- Other trademarks owned by D & D Group Pty Limited
- Other trademarks owned by D & D Group Pty Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named LOKK · BOLT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2026 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Apr 4, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 26, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2024 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 12, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 12, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 12, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 25, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 31, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 24, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |