USPTO serial 78146813
ULTIMATE HACKING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 14, 2004
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ULTIMATE HACKING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Mission Viejo, CA
Mission Viejo, CA
Mission Viejo, CA
NETWORKS ASSOCIATES TECHNOLOGY, INC.
SANTA CLARA, CA
Other trademarks owned by NETWORKS ASSOCIATES TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Diane M. Reed
KEVIN J ZILKA ESQ ZILKA-KOTAB PC95 S MARKET ST STE 420SAN JOSE, CA 95113UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational and training services, namely, seminars and classes relating to computer security systems, policies and procedures and relating to how to evaluate and solve computer security problems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Foundstone, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Foundstone, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Foundstone, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by NETWORKS ASSOCIATES TECHNOLOGY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named ULTIMATE HACKING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 22, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 2, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |