USPTO serial 78146926
MOHAWK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MOHAWK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hogansburg, NY
Hogansburg, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eugene Berman
EUGENE BERMAN LAW OFFICES OF EUGENE BERMAN26 CEDARWOOD CTROCKVILLE, MD 20852UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | Cigarettes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 12, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 1, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 31, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |