USPTO serial 78146994
VALLEY CONCIERGE EXECUTIVE CONCIERGE SERVICE VC VALLEY CONCIERGE, INC. WWW.VALLEYCONCIERGE.COM TELL US WHAT YOU NEED & CONSIDER IT DONE !
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VALLEY CONCIERGE EXECUTIVE CONCIERGE SERVICE VC VALLEY CONCIERGE, INC. WWW.VALLEYCONCIERGE.COM TELL US WHAT YOU NEED & CONSIDER IT DONE !?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Scottsdale, AZ
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | Concierge services for others comprising making requested personal arrangements and reservations and providing customer-specific information to meet individual needs rendered together in various environments namely, apartment complex, office building, shopping center, and corporation | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Gillis, Wayne
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named VALLEY CONCIERGE EXECUTIVE CONCIERGE SERVICE VC VALLEY CONCIERGE, INC. WWW.VALLEYCONCIERGE.COM TELL US WHAT YOU NEED & CONSIDER IT DONE !
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 15, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |