Drawing for Q-MAX

USPTO serial 78147538

Q-MAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRYAN JOHNSON, HELLEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with Q-MAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matt W. Carson

MATT W CARSON BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED9100 EMMOTT RDHOUSTON, TX 77040UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Power operated tools, namely, remote controlled fluid and gas flow control devices that are part of sub sea well completion equipment, namely, packers, safety valves, power supply devices, valves, sliding sleeves; remote controlled variable choke and shut off valves that are part of sub sea well completion equipment, namely, sliding sleeves and packers; remotely activated downhole tools, namely, packers, flow control valves, sliding sleeves, and power suppliers; hydraulic controllers used in controlling the fluid flow in wells; all the foregoing to be used in downhole oil, gas or injection wells.ACTIVE—
008Hand operated tools, namely, remote controlled fluid and gas flow control valves; remote controlled variable choke and shut off valves, namely, packers, flow control valves, sliding sleeves, and power suppliers; all the foregoing to be used in downhole oil, gas or injection wells.ACTIVE—
009Well control apparatus for downhole oil, gas or injection wells, namely, downhole computerized electrical, fiber optic, electromechanical, electro hydraulic and opto-hydraulic controllers for use in controlling the fluid flow in wells; production well pressure, temperature, flow, and chemical sensors; fixed downhole formation evaluation sensors; electrical inflation and deflation controllers, namely, valves to operate inflatable packers; remote controlled automatic metal fluid and gas flow control valves; remote controlled variable automatic choke and shut off valves; automatic safety valves; computer and video monitors for measuring valves pressure; telemetry devices, namely, fiber optic lines, acoustic and electrical conductors for two way communication, transceivers for two way communication, fiber optic sensors.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 28, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 13, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance