Drawing for ATRAXIS

USPTO serial 78147829

ATRAXIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GASKINS, TONJA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ATRAXIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVE 10TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computers, computer programs and computer software for use in maintenance and engineering, documentation, decision support for flight scheduling, vehicle maintenance planning, flight planning, airline reservation and fare quotation, passenger revenue accounting, vehicle departure control, airport information management, staff planning and labor reporting, cargo reservation, information and documentation; computer software for use in airline multimodal flight and logistics planning; computer software for use in tracking, control, and purchase order management in the field of air transport and related industries, namely, transportation of goods of others via car, rail, air, truck, or ship; computer operating programs, computer peripherals, computer keyboards, blank magnetic data carriers, blank optical disks, optical scanners, computer memories, data processors; blank floppy disks for computers, computer disk drivesACTIVE—
035Retail store services featuring computer hardware and software; on-line retail store services featuring computer hardware and software; retail services by direct solicitation by sales agents in the field of computer hardware and software; mail order catalog services featuring computer hardware and software; business management consultation in the field of air transport and related industries; business consultation services in the field of information technologyACTIVE—
039Electronic storage of data for others; providing a website featuring information in the fields of air transport and transportation of goods via car, rail, air, truck or ship and providing a website containing an online database in the field of air transport and transportation of goods via car, rail, air truck or shipACTIVE—
042Computer consultation services in the field of computer hardware; computer programming for others, updating of computer software, computer software development and design for others; rental of data processing equipment and computer software in the field of air transport and related industries, namely, transportation of goods of others via car, rail, air, truck, or ship; planning and construction of computer networks; recovery of computer data, installation and maintenance of computer software; computer systems analysis; licensing of intellectual property; patent exploitation, namely patent licensing; patent agency and industrial property consultation, and consultation in the field of patent exploitation; technical project feasibility studies; quality control for others in the field of air transport and related industries; research and development of new products for others; computer servicesACTIVE—
045SECURITY CONSULTATION SERVICES; ELECTRONIC MONITORING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF SECURITY LOCKS FOR OTHERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 11, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 19, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 29, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 18, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 18, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 17, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 2, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 28, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 10, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 19, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance