USPTO serial 78147894
MOTU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GASKINS, TONJA M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MOTU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Egbert
JOHN S EGBERT AND JEREMY CRAFT HARRISON & EGBERT412 MAIN ST 7TH FLHOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shorts, shirts, T-shirts, swimsuits, blouses, skirts, scarves, gloves, pants, sweaters, jerseys, socks, jackets, suits, training suits, vests, neckties, belts, suspenders, dresses, coats, raincoats, overcoats, smocks, underwear, pajamas, brassieres, corsets, slips, lingerie; headwear, namely, hats, caps and berets; footwear, namely, boots, sandals, shoes and slippers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 12, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 7, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 9, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 13, 2003 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |