Drawing for SYNERGY

USPTO serial 78148017

SYNERGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3032757Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 20, 2005
Examiner
PERKINS, KARLA M
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SYNERGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Fruit juice drinks; carbonated and non-carbonated soft drinks; energy drinks, namely sports drinks, enhanced with vitamins minerals, caffeine, nutrients, amino acids, or herbs and aerated waterSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDJul 26, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 25, 2010C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Aug 25, 2010CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 18, 2010CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Dec 10, 2009PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 20, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 9, 2005REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 9, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 1, 2005CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Oct 20, 2005SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 7, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 27, 2005PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Sep 27, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2005PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Sep 7, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 28, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 14, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 6, 2004TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 6, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 6, 2004PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 9, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 7, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 25, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 25, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 14, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 22, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 2, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 27, 2003EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
May 19, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 19, 2003GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 13, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 20, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance