USPTO serial 78148362
OMG UML
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OMG UML?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark L. Beloborodov
DEBORAH PECKHAM KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART NICHOLSON GRAHAM75 STATE STATTN TM ADMINISTRATORBOSTON, MA 02109-1808Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable electronic publications in the nature of articles, books, pamphlets, newsletters, periodicals, instructional materials, and manuals pertaining to electronic industry technical standards, specifications, computer programming and computer programming languages, platforms and software development. | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed publications, namely articles, books, pamphlets, newsletters, periodicals, instructional materials, and manuals pertaining to electronic industry technical standards, specifications, computer programming and computer programming languages, platforms and software development. | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Arranging and conducting of symposiums, exhibitions and conferences in the field of electronic industry technical standards, specifications, computer programming and computer programming languages, platforms and software development. | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, conducting courses, seminars, workshops, and classes in the field of electronic industry technical standards, specifications, computer programming and computer programming languages, platforms and software development and distributing course materials in connection therewith; publishing and editorial consultation services in the field of electronic industry technical standards, specifications, computer programming and computer programming languages, platforms and software development, distribution of printed and online publications in the field of electronic industry technical standards, specifications, computer programming and computer programming languages, platforms and software development | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Object Management Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named OMG UML
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 19, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 18, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |