USPTO serial 78148562
SENSYS GTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3265604Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 17, 2007
- Examiner
- BROWNE, DAYNA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SENSYS GTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SLIEMA, MT
IRVINE, CA
Chandler, AZ
Chandler, AZ
Chandler, AZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah S. Shepherd
Deborah S. Shepherd Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP2040 Main Street, 14th FloorIrvine, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical diagnostic and monitoring apparatus, excluding digital camera or imaging systems, namely, a blood/tissue monitoring system for the non-invasive determination of analyte concentration by use of near-infrared radiation | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 29, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SENSYS MEDICAL LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by GLT ACQUISITIONS CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by Sensys Medical
- Other trademarks owned by Sensys Medical
- Other trademarks owned by Sensys Medical
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named SENSYS GTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 15, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |