Drawing for FEAR STATION

USPTO serial 78148593

FEAR STATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TAYLOR, DAVID T
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FEAR STATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer L. Scully

JENNIFER L SCULLY FOSTER PEPPER & SHEFELMAN, PLLC1111 THIRD AVE STE 3400SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail store services in the field of art, film, television, technology and entertainment featuring t-shirts, hats, keychains, mugs, posters, prerecorded videotapes, DVDs, CDs and cassettes, Halloween costumes, and memorabilia in the area of suspense and horror films; electronic retailing services in the field of art, film, television, technology and entertainment featuring t-shirts, hats, keychains, mugs, posters, prerecorded videotapes, DVDs, CDs and cassettes, Halloween costumes, and memorabilia in the area of suspense and horror films via a global computer network; catalog and mail order services in the field of art, film, television, technology and entertainment featuring t-shirts, hats, keychains, mugs, posters, prerecorded videotapes, DVDs, CDs and cassettes, Halloween costumes, and memorabilia in the area of suspense and horror films; electronic billboard advertising; advertising and marketing services for others, namely, promotion of movies and television and radio programs in the suspense and horror genreACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 8, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 8, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 15, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 23, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 3, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 12, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 2, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 14, 2003REINREINSTATED—
Aug 20, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 20, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 16, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance