USPTO serial 78148605
GELVIN, JACKSON & STARR, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, DAVID T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GELVIN, JACKSON & STARR, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer L. Whitelaw
JENNIFER L WHITELAW LAW OFFICE OF JENNIFER L WHITELAW3838 TAMIAMI TRAIL NTHIRD FLNAPLES, FL 34103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Banking services; financial services in the nature of an investment security; financial information in the nature of rates of exchange, financial exchange, financial forecasting and financial guarantee and surety; financial information provided by electronic means; financial management; financial planning; financial portfolio management; financial research; financial valuation of personal property and real estate; loan financing; lease-purchase financing; financing services; investment services, namely investment brokerage; capital investment consultation; commodity investment advice; fund investment consultation; investment consultation; financial investment in the field of securities; funds investment; mutual funds investment; real estate investment; commodity investment advice; investment advice; investment brokerage; investment clubs; capital investment consultation; investment management; maintaining escrow accounts for investments; investment of funds for others; insurance services, namely insurance underwriting, brokerage and extended warranty contracts in the fields of life, health, accident, fire, marine, medical and pre-paid health care and legal services; insurance administration in the field of life, health, accident, fire, marine, medical and pre-paid health care and legal services; insurance agencies in the fields of life, health, accident, fire, marine, medical and pre-paid health care and legal services; appraisals for insurance claims of personal property and real estate; insurance brokerage, consultation, subrogation and actuarial services in the fields of life, health, accident, fire, marine, medical and pre-paid health care and legal services; debit card services; credit card services; electronic interactive banking services; internet banking services; safety deposit box services; and information services for all for the foregoing provided via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 29, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 10, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |