USPTO serial 78149077
PINEAPPLE PRINCESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2955504Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 24, 2005
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PINEAPPLE PRINCESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Redondo Beach, CA
Redondo Beach, CA
Redondo Beach, CA
Redondo Beach, CA
Redondo Beach, CA
Redondo Beach, CA
Redondo Beach, CA
Redondo Beach, CA
Redondo Beach, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher J. Day
Christopher J. Day Law Office of Christopher Day9977 North 90th Street, Suite 155Scottsdale, AZ 85258UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | BODY AND BATH PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SOAP, SALT BODY SCRUB, SALT FACIAL SCRUB, HAND CREAM, SCENTED BATH SALTS, BATH OIL, BATH GEL, POTPOURRI, AND SCENTED LINEN SPRAY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hart, Danielle
- Other trademarks owned by Pugh, Sonja
- Other trademarks owned by Pugh, Sonja
- Other trademarks owned by Pugh, Sonja
- Other trademarks owned by Guth, Shyanne
- Other trademarks owned by Guth, Shyanne
- Other trademarks owned by Guth, Shyanne
- Other trademarks owned by Hart, Danielle
- Other trademarks owned by Hart, Danielle
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named PINEAPPLE PRINCESS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 11, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 7, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 31, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2003 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |