USPTO serial 78149157
A MARCA BAVARIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with A MARCA BAVARIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TORONTO, ONTARIO M9W 5E4, CA
TORONTO, CA
Rio de Janeiro, RJ`, BR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Okin Goldsmith, Esq.
SUSAN OKIN GOLDSMITH ESQ DUANE MORRIS LLP100 COLLEGE RD W STE 100PRINCETON, NJ 08540UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Brewed alcoholic beverages, namely beer | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 16, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |