Drawing for REAL CLOTH EZ ONES

USPTO serial 78149301

REAL CLOTH EZ ONES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLYBURN, CARLA DIONNE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with REAL CLOTH EZ ONES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen P. McNamara

Stephen P. McNamara St. Onge Steward Johnston & Reens LLC986 Bedford StreetStamford, CT 06905-5619UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020NON-METAL CONTAINER FOR DISPENSING INTERLEAVED BABY WIPESABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 24, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 16, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 27, 2009MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 27, 2009ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 27, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 27, 2009OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Mar 19, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 19, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 23, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 27, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 27, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 12, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 23, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 24, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 16, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 8, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 13, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 23, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance