USPTO serial 78149355
TOWPOWER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TOWPOWER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
North Elkhart, IN
North Elkhart, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael S. Hargis
JAMES DIMITRIJEVS MCDONALD HOPKINS CO., LPA2100 BANK ONE CTR 600 SUPERIOR AVECLEVELAND, OH 44114-2653UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TRAILER WIRING, TRAILER ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS, ELECTRICAL CONTROLS FOR TRAILER BRAKES, 12 VOLT CONVERTERS, AND 12 VOLT CIRCUIT PROTECTORS | ACTIVE | Dec 4, 2002 |
| 012 | VEHICLE TOWING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, TRAILER HITCHES, GOOSE NECK HITCHES, FIFTH WHEEL HITCHES, STEP BUMPER HITCHES; TRAILER HITCH ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, HITCH BALLS, HITCH BALL COVERS, TRAILER RECEIVERS, TRAILER COUPLERS, SAFETY CHAINS, PULL PINS, CLIPS, SWAY CONTROLS, TRAILER LOCKS, TOW HOOKS, PINTLE HOOKS AND ADAPTERS | ACTIVE | Dec 4, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 18, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 24, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |