USPTO serial 78149388
Z TECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Z TECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heather M. Barnes
John M. Skeriotis BROUSE McDOWELL388 S. Main St.Suite 500AKRON, OH 44311-4407Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | preservation, detailing, reconditioning, maintenance and repair services for vehicles; preservation, reconditioning vehicle glass replacement and repair; rustproofing services for vehicles, soundproofing of vehicles, automotive paint repair, interior vacuuming, interior cleaning of seats, carpets, headliners, door panels, dashboards, decks, exterior cleaning polishing, cleaning engines, application of graphics to vehicle body; after market installation on vehicles of truck bedliners, sunroofs, splash guards, protective moldings, running boards, truck pass-through windows, bug deflectors, van racks, cab extenders, grill guards, luggage racks, burglar alarms, window tinting, trailer hitches, remote vehicle starters, electric door locks and power windows | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 2002 |
| 040 | application of protective coatings to prevent road abrasions, applications of protective coatings to interior surfaces, application of protective sealants to exterior painted and non-painted surfaces, and protective film applied to windows | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Z TECH RUSTPROOFING, CAR CARE & ACCESSORIES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Z TECH RUSTPROOFING, CAR CARE & ACCESSORIES, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named Z TECH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |