Drawing for USB NOW

USPTO serial 78149398

USB NOW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINE, STEVEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with USB NOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

G. Roxanne Elings

G ROXANNE ELINGS GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP885 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computers; computer software for integrating microprocessors with real time computer operating systems, universal serial bus hardware, universal serial bus software, and computer software development tools for mobile applications; computer hardware; computer operating programs; computer peripherals; computer chips; integrated circuits; blank integrated circuit cards; microprocessors; computer interface boards; printed circuits; computer software development tools; computer graphics software; blank smart cards; data processors; computer keyboards; computer memories; acoustic couplers; blank magnetic data carriers; blank computer discs; computer disk drives; digital video disc drives; blank floppy computer discs; and optical fibers sold as a component of fiber optical cablesACTIVE—
016Instruction manuals for computersACTIVE—
042Design for others of computer hardware and computer software; rental, maintenance and updating of computer software; computer programming for others; computer systems analysis; computer time-sharing services; and related consultation servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 6, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 6, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 4, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 12, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 22, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 11, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 8, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 6, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 6, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 21, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 21, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 19, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 2, 2004GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 2003GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 16, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 2, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance