CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for NEW ORLEANS HORNETS

USPTO serial 78149473

NEW ORLEANS HORNETS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3181457Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 5, 2006
Examiner
WOOD, CAROLINE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with NEW ORLEANS HORNETS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anil V. George

ANIL V. GEORGE NBA PROPERTIES, INC.645 FIFTH AVENUEOPLYMPIC TOWERSNEW YORK, NY 10022

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Web casting services in the nature of providing on-line chat rooms and on-line interactive chat rooms with guests for transmission of messages among computer users concerning the field of basketball; broadcasting programs over the Internet; providing on-line electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users concerning the field of basketballSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDSep 1, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 7, 2017CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Dec 5, 2015REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 8, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 1, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 19, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 12, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 20, 2012NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2012C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 20, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 8, 2012E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 30, 2006REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 27, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 19, 2006CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Oct 10, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 13, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 13, 2006EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Apr 3, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 16, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 16, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 16, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 16, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 16, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 22, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 8, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 8, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 24, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 14, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 14, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 16, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 23, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 3, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 27, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 17, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 13, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 13, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance