USPTO serial 78149927
BOUNTY HUNTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BOUNTY HUNTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tonganoxia, KS
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | TOYS, NAMELY, TOY TRUCKS, TOY MODEL TRUCKS, AND TOY DIE-CAST COLLECTIBLE TRUCKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 17, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 18, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |