USPTO serial 78150102
THE WHITES COLLECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOULTON, KELLY F
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE WHITES COLLECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BOUCHERVILLE, QUEBEC J4B 6H5, CA
Imperial Home Decor Group Management, Inc.
Cleveland, OH
Other trademarks owned by Imperial Home Decor Group Management, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James A. Dimitrijevs, Esq.
JAMES A DIMITRIJEVS ESQ MCDONALD, HOPKINS, BURKE & HABER, CO L2100 BANK ONE CTR600 SUPERIOR AVE ECLEVELAND, OH 44114-2653Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 41870695 CANADA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Imperial Home Decor Group Management, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named THE WHITES COLLECTION
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 14, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |