Drawing for RESORTQUEST, THE VACATION RENTAL AUTHORITY

USPTO serial 78150161

RESORTQUEST, THE VACATION RENTAL AUTHORITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BERK, STEVEN R
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RESORTQUEST, THE VACATION RENTAL AUTHORITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John M. Cone

JOHN M CONE AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLPP O BOX 688DALLAS, TX 75313-0688UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036rental and management of vacation real estateACTIVE—
043travel agency services, namely, making reservations and bookings for temporary lodging in the field of vacation real estateACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 10, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 10, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 21, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 22, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 22, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 22, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 16, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 13, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 21, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 1, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 26, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 31, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance